Lisa Roberts blog

2010/07/20

100% sustainable energy

Filed under: animation, circle — Lisa @ 11:20

movie12sound

The link above leads to the animation sustainability presented in movie format (.avi).
The animation is set to the voice of the environmental scientist Mark Diesendorf.
In the animation, Mark explains that:

* 100% renewable energy is possible in Australia right now.
* We have the technology but government action is needed in order achieve this.
* Australia is well placed to develop a clean and sustainable power industry.

You are free to include this file in your website for not-for-profit use.

Contact me at lisa@lisaroberts.com.au to arrange delivery via Yousendit.
The animation is available as an .avi (40.3 MB) and .swf (3.0 MB).

2010/07/19

Drawing is seeing

Filed under: circle, cross, drawing, spiral — Lisa @ 21:17
2010-06-24 Euphausia superba drawing 01

Drawing krill is seeing energy in motion

Last month I saw these krill at the Australian Antarctic Division’s krill nursery in Tasmania.

2010/07/18

New media for critical thinking

Filed under: Literature — Lisa @ 14:38

Brookfield question8 from OLA Media Project on Vimeo.

2010/07/10

Expanding perceptions

Filed under: Literature, animation, writing — Lisa @ 12:12

Photo: J-Brokowski, Australia Antarctic Division 2010


What is knowledge and what is belief?

In Antarctic Animation: Expanding perceptions with gesture and line (thesis submitted April 2010), I demonstrate the need to combine scientific data with aesthetic responses in order to accurately communicate climate change information.

Can information gathered, created and shared by scientists and artists, while working together in Antarctica, be made accessible through an animated online interface? Could such an interface represent a whole, unified ecosystem?

I am not alone in believing that most people can know the world from both a scientific and aesthetic (sensory) perspective. A combination of these perspectives is essential for human survival.

Because human perceptions are based on belief systems, our views must be expanded in oder to increase our understanding of the world.

Are belief systems necessarily moral?

In his essay, Moral Frames for Landscape in Canadian Literature, Ronald Bordessa identifies three conceptual worldviews ( Simpson-Housely and Norcliffe, 1992, p.58):

Religious – Man against Nature, anthropocentric ethic
Scientific – Man in Nature, biocentric ethic
Existential – Man as Nature, ecocentric view

Bordessa further identifies the Existential view as ‘Aesthetics: A world of Dissolved Differences’ (p.59).

I fail to understand what is moral about the Scientific and Existential views.

Powered by WordPress